He University Electoral Drillthis was carried out Tuesday May 7and in this they participated about 400 universities of the country, even though the official results will be published tomorrow, some preliminary results give a massive vote to Claudia Sheinbaumpresidential candidate for the coalition “Let’s keep making history”.
The preliminary data of the exercise, give the winner of the electoral contest to the standard bearer of Morena, PT and the Green partyClaudia Sheinbaum, while second place goes to Jorge Álvarez Máynezcandidate for Citizen movementwhile the preferences for Xochitl Galvezcandidate of PAN, PRI y PRD They are not encouraging.
You might be interested: Morena asks the INE to consider Xóchitl Gálvez’s campaign spending on the “Marea Rosa” march
One of the universities that participated in the Electoral Simulation was the University of Guanajuatowhere a participation of 247 voters was registered, of which 135 votes were for Claudia Sheinbaum, while Jorge Álvarez Máynez registered 63 votes and Xóchitl Gálvez 37 votes.
Also, at the Faculty of Medicine and Nutrition of the Juarez University of the Durango Statethe victory went to Claudia Sheinbaum, who received 278 votes in favor, while Xóchitl Gálvez 43 votes and Jorge Álvarez Máynez 149 votes, out of a total of 470 voters.
You might be interested: Sedena fails to deliver files on “flights of death”: Experts
Meanwhile, the Technological University of Tecámac It had a participation of 508 students, of which 379 votes went to Claudia Sheinbaum, Jorge Álvarez Máynez received 93 votes and Xóchitl Gálvez 24 votes.
LEO
Related
University simulation yields massive vote for Sheinbaum and Máynez grows in preferences
Trump Slams Biden for Refusing to Support Israel in Rafah – Accuses President of Standing with Terrorists
Former US President Donald Trump, the presidential candidate of the Republican Party, criticized the current President Joe Biden for refusing to support Israel in its military operation in Rafah.
In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump said: “Crook Joe stands with these terrorists (referring to Hamas) just as he stood with the terrorists who took over our college campuses .”
He said: “Biden is weak and corrupt, and he is leading the world directly to World War II,” claiming again that the war between Israel and Hamas “would not have started if he had been president.” “
Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir suggested the same issue, and he posted a tweet on his account on the “X” platform, which said: “Hamas loves Biden,” and placed a heart symbol between the two word, referring to the “friendly relationship” between them.
Biden had threatened Israel to stop the supply of weapons if he continued to work in Rafah, as he said in an interview with CNN: “We will not provide weapons and artillery shells to Israel, Israel will not receive our support if it into population centers Rafah.
The United States suspended the shipment of weapons to Israel, including heavy bombs that it uses in its military campaign on the Gaza Strip, which has killed more than 34,000 Palestinians so far.
For his part, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, said that Biden’s interesting statement was “sad and very disappointing.”
Speaking to Israeli public radio “Makan”, Erdan said: “Of course, any pressure on Israel is interpreted by our enemies as something that gives them hope.”
He also said: “There are many Jewish Americans who voted for the president and the Democratic Party, and now they are hesitant.
#Trumps #Comments #Bidens #Statements #Wait #World #War
2024-05-09 07:54:31
Related posts:
The Truth Behind the Paris Terrorist Attacks: Unveiling Selective Reporting and Moral Hypocrisy
On May 4, Chantal Guy from The Press wrote a text on the terrorist attacks which set Paris ablaze on November 13, 2015.
“Paris was the target of the worst terrorist attacks in its history,” she wrote.
It was an “irruption of violence into the daily life of such a lively city”.
“Chance wanted me to be in Paris that evening, in the heart of the 11th arrondissement, where most of the shootings took place.”
“We could hear Kalashnikov shots.”
“What struck me was the youth of the victims and killers, in a deliberate attack on the pleasure of living.”
But who committed these attacks?
Who fired a Kalashnikov at innocent people?
Chantal Guy never says it.
The words “Islam” and “Islamist” never appear in his text.
She talks about disaster.
Of events.
But the cause? Ugh.
A detail.
Which she chose to ignore.
History, I imagine, of not “feeding Islamophobia”.
To paraphrase The Stranger from Camus: “Yesterday, Paris died.
Perhaps it was Christians who fired.
The text doesn’t say it. “Bloody city. Funeral soon.”
It does not mean anything. Maybe they were Buddhists.”
HIDE THIS CAUSE!
I’m asking you a very simple question.
What if it was far-right activists who killed 129 people in cold blood that fateful evening?
Do you think that the journalist from The Press would have concealed this fact?
Of course not.
She would have written it in her first paragraph. And she would have repeated it ten times, at least.
With reason.
Because that wouldn’t be a detail.
It would even be at the heart of the massacre.
Deliberately hiding why 129 innocent people were killed, on what ideological pyre these victims were immolated, at what altar their assassins prayed, for what cause they were slaughtered like animals, is to kill them a second time.
“To name things badly is to add to the misfortune of the world,” as Camus said.
SELECTIVE INDIGNATION
I’m talking to you about this text because the author’s deafening silence says a lot about the moral hypocrisy of our time.
Not a day goes by without denouncing the excesses and dangers of the extreme right.
It’s very simple, we see fascists everywhere.
But the far left? Isn’t she also dangerous?
And what about the Islamist threat?
Why aren’t the “social justice soldiers” who are loudly protesting against Israel also protesting against Iran? Afghanistan? China? What about all the other countries that imprison and execute women, homosexuals, regime opponents or members of religious minorities?
No. We ALWAYS aim for the same targets.
The West, the far right and the Christian right. In short, the white devil.
The other extremism, that which leans to the left and which embraces Islam (the dominant religion in so-called “racialized” communities) is “protected”.
Either we minimize its dangerousness.
Or – when it draws blood – we “forget” to name it.
As if there were two kinds of extremists.
The evil white fascists.
And those who became evil because of evil white fascists.
1715245665
#Demonstrate #Israel.. #Iran
The Truth Behind the Paris Terrorist Attacks: Unveiling Selective Reporting and Moral Hypocrisy