Isabelle Duminy leaves her job as an executive assistant at 5:30 p.m. that day, and begins her second day, that of justice conciliator. Neither a lawyer nor a magistrate, her mission consists of trying to resolve disputes amicably. She comes to check on a resident. She bought an estate vehicle a few months ago, but things aren’t going as planned. She finds herself in the middle of a family dispute with a car she can’t register. Despite dozens of letters, the situation is getting bogged down. Desperate, she calls on Isabelle who contacts the recalcitrant heir. It will only take a few calls to reach an agreement and thus avoid going to court. Volunteering, Isabelle devotes her free time to resolving everyday disputes. Those who poison life. In addition to home visits, she provides on-call services in several municipalities. That evening, she set up her office in the town hall of Vireaux, 140 inhabitants. Isabelle is one of 2,700 justice conciliators in France. They are all trained at the National School of Magistrates. For disputes below 5,000 euros, recourse to a conciliator or mediator is mandatory. Alongside the conciliators, judges and also lawyers are trained in amicable settlements. What attitude should we adopt if tempers become heated? How to argue if the dialogue is broken? The training goes beyond the law course. The objective of this amicable justice is also to unclog the courts, where the processing of these cases can take years. For conciliators alone, nearly 180,000 files were opened in 2022. Neighborhood quarrels that never end. A conflict with a landlord making everyday life unbearable. Cohabitation is not always easy. In Pont-Audemer, 9,000 inhabitants, the town decided to create its own team of civil mediators responsible for defusing disputes. Recognizable with their red jacket, they roam the neighborhoods to meet residents. Employed by the town hall, the five mediators can be reached 24 hours a day. The creation of the service a year ago made it possible to relieve the municipal police, who are regularly called upon in the event of a conflict. The municipality’s team of mediators intervenes in nearly 150 cases every month. TF1 | Report L. Merlier, E. Fourny, M. Merle
Conciliators: at the heart of justice like no other – 8 p.m. news
“Pulled out and touched his penis.” A bachelorette party in Riga ends with a shocking exit of a taxi driver
#Pulled #touched #penis #bachelorette #party #Riga #ends #shocking #exit #taxi #driver
“Yesterday the bachelorette party ended with the fact that taxi driver pulled out and touched his penis.
A very interesting day to have such a first (and hopefully last) life experience. There were three of us in the taxi, it was a bright day, Bolt and we reported to the police,” the playwright and publicist begins the story.
Here the car number, if any. In the name of Vyacheslav. pic.twitter.com/zA6IQuFBv8
— Anete Konste🇱🇻🇺🇦 (@liikcepure) April 22, 2024
She also reveals that the inappropriate car driver’s name is Vyacheslav.
Answering the questions of other users of the social network, it is revealed that the driver acted like this in broad daylight in the very center of Riga.
Yes, you really wouldn’t want to experience something like that alone in a more remote place, in this case he bravely did it in the very center of Riga – we got off at the Radisson (Latvija hotel) when the red light came on.
— Anete Konste🇱🇻🇺🇦 (@liikcepure) April 22, 2024
The women involved in the incident also contacted the company “Bolt” and the law enforcement officers.
Yesterday we were only told that they will no longer offer him as a driver to the dachshund caller (but the other two of us can theoretically call him again). The rest will be considered according to internal protocols. The policeman said that it was his first such incident, he looked confused.
— Anete Konste🇱🇻🇺🇦 (@liikcepure) April 22, 2024
Commenting more directly on the reaction of the law enforcement officer to the incident, Konste says: “He smiled nervously and said that this can be classified as hooliganism or emotional sexual violence, but he needs to read in which cases this article can be applied.”
Related News
Germany rejects ‘complicity in genocide’ in Gaza
The German Government claimed this Tuesday what it called its “permanent duty to defend the existence and security” of Israel and its “responsibility derived from the Holocaust”, in response to the accusation of “complicity in a genocide” in Gaza made by Nicaragua before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
The ICJ today concluded two days of hearings on the need to issue precautionary measures against Germany, whom Managua accused of “complicity” in a “plausible genocide” against the Palestinians, and demanded that it “suspend” its political support as a matter of “extreme urgency.” , financial and military to Israel.
Nicaragua differentiated between supporting the Government of Benjamin Netanyahu and the “understandable and praiseworthy” support for the Jewish people.
To these Nicaraguan claims pronounced yesterday by its ambassador, Carlos José Arguello Gómez, the General Director of Legal Affairs of Germany, Tania von Uslar-Gleichen, responded today to reiterate the official discourse that Berlin is “guided” by its “permanent duty to defend the existence and security of the State of Israel” and his “responsibility derived from the Holocaust.”
“This responsibility must continue to guide us because Israel’s right to exist continues to be denied. In fact, he refuses in Nicaragua’s request, in the section dedicated to the Hamas massacre of October 7. According to Nicaragua, these attacks were directed against ‘settlements located in the occupied Palestinian territories,’” Uslar-Gleichen explained.
In its written request, Managua states that “Palestinian Hamas paramilitary forces attacked Israeli settlements located in the occupied Palestinian territories of Sderot, Kfar Azza, Nir Oz and Be’eri.”
“Does Nicaragua then say by its characterization that these are occupied Palestinian territories, thus denying Israel’s right to exist?” the diplomat asked.
He said he “will not tolerate this,” that the international community founded the Israeli state as “a safe haven for the Jewish people” and that Hamas attacks targeted “communities located within Israel’s borders: Not in Gaza, but in the State of Israel,” he specified.
Firm rejection
Germany “firmly” rejected the accusations made by Nicaragua and regretted that it “projects the image of a Germany that deliberately allows, or even aids and encourages, the alleged commission of the most serious violations of international law,” when, it maintained, not many countries They have shown an “intense level of commitment” to the Palestinians as Berlin did.
In this sense, he assured that Germany “remains committed” to the two-state solution as the “only path to lasting peace” in the region and mentioned trips to the Middle East and statements by the German Foreign Minister, Annalena Baerbock, in which He calls the suffering of the Palestinians “indescribable” and life in Gaza “hell.”
“These quotes prove that Germany is fulfilling its obligations to ensure respect for international humanitarian law,” he noted. Nicaragua affirmed that the German Government even ignored the warnings of its officials about the situation in Gaza and preferred to maintain its support for Netanyahu despite the war in the Strip.
“Germany has learned from its past. A past that includes responsibility for one of the most terrible crimes in the history of humanity, the Shoah (Hebrew term for Holocaust),” added Uslar-Gleichen.
With this, he added, Germany has affirmed since October 7 “Israel’s right to protect itself,” and argued that there is the “dilemma that Hamas terrorists use the civilian population as human shields and abuse civilian infrastructure to hide their terrorist activities.”
“Unlike Nicaragua, Germany is not blind to the fact that Hamas also has obligations under international humanitarian law, including towards the civilian population in Gaza,” he reiterated.
He also explained that the supply of weapons and military equipment to Israel is “subject to a continuous assessment of the situation on the ground” and considered that “the entire international community is grappling with a political, legal and moral dilemma posed by the situation in Gaza.” ”, promising that Berlin has tried to “find the right balance.”
The judges have retired to deliberate on the need for the requested precautionary measures.which will be known on a date not yet announced.
This is the second procedure opened in the context of the Israeli war in Gaza.
Last December, South Africa accused Israel of violating the Genocide Convention with its bombings of the Strip and the ICJ issued precautionary measures twice, in January and March, demanding Israel take action to prevent the extermination of the Palestinians. from Gaza.
Leave a Reply