Are the billions in Magdeburg well invested?

Everything has a price, especially things that don’t cost anything.

Art van Rheyn You have activated an ad blocker. That’s why our site is currently unavailable for you.

Advertisements are an important source of income for news sites like WirtschaftsWoche Online. We can use the advertising revenue to pay for the work of our editorial team and publish quality articles free of charge.

Unfortunately, you are denying us this income. If you value our offer, please turn off the ad blocker.

Thank you for your understanding,
Your Wiwo editorial team

Related

See also  5 ETFs that make more returns than the MSCI World

adobeartificial intelligenceArtificial Intelligence (AI)AttachmentChina CircleComponentscomputer weekCorporate managementdigitalizationgelsingerGlobalfoundrieshuaweiIndustry analysisinformation TechnologyIntelInvestment tip sharemetaverseMicrosoftNVIDIAPatQualcommrestructuringSamsungsemiconductorSharestock analysisStock analysis by industryTeslaTSMCUberall

Are the billions in Magdeburg well invested?

Collective action by Profeco against Ticketmaster comes to an end: This is how you will benefit

The Federal Consumer Protection Agency (Profeco) ended the collective action against Ticketmaster due to lawsuits filed by almost 500 consumers.

Through an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, it was indicated that people affected by the unilateral cancellation of the events offered.

It should be remembered that the lawsuit was initially filed by 434 consumers who demanded the cancellation of tickets in entertainment, artistic, cultural and sporting events by Ticketmaster.

Ticketmaster must pay a million-dollar amount after agreement with Profeco

Profeco issued a statement in which it was assured that Ticketmaster agreed to refund the total cost of tickets cancelled, in addition to granting a bonus to those affected.

The agreement indicates that they will be allocated 3.4 million pesos to the consumers who demanded the unilateral cancellation of artistic, cultural and entertainment events.

It is stated that a part of the group of consumers who confirmed the impact were refunded the full cost of the ticket plus service charges and a 20 percent bonus.

Most read in Business

“The lawsuit was initially filed by 434 consumers who claimed the unilateral cancellation of the purchase of tickets for various entertainment, artistic, cultural and sporting events by “Ticketmaster.” With the actions considered in this agreement, the beneficiaries are compensated with a total amount that reaches more than 3.4 million pesos.”

Profeco

However, this measure was not applied to tickets that were canceled due to the emergency. Covid 19 Because users were only refunded the price of the tickets under the argument that the cancellation was due to a global health crisis.

At this time, the number of affected people whose events were canceled due to the Covid 19 pandemic is unknown.

The announcement comes after reviewing and analyzing the judicial agreement, where the Ninth District Judge in Civil Matters of Mexico City, Guillermo Osorio Campos approved it on April 23, 2024, elevating it to the category of res judicata.

Ticketmaster (Ticketmaster)

How to join the Profeco class action against Ticketmaster?

Profeco announced that other people will be able to join the benefits granted after the agreement with Ticketmaster.

To do this, you must verify within the period from April 24, 2024 to October 24, 2025 that the show organizer canceled one of your events.

However, this will only be applicable for the period between January 1, 2020 and until December 31, 2023. If the issue does not apply to this date, you will not be able to request to join this class action.

Ticketmaster and the fiasco at the Bad Bunny concert (Eduardo Díaz)

Collective action by Profeco against Ticketmaster comes to an end: This is how you will benefit

Demographic problem: Brings new measures to the insurance until 2070
– 2024-04-26 23:13:13

Shock measures for the insurance system or funding of the system with additional resources of 0.5% of GDP.

These are the two alternatives for insurance in a depth of 40 to 50 years, due to the acute demographic problem. Some of the measures listed are nightmarish as they raise the retirement limit at 73 years, cut pensions by 30% and they increase the insurance to 35% (for main and auxiliary pension).

These are actuarial studies that they prepare alternative scenarios to address the effects of the demographic problem.

Its worsening poses painful dilemmas for dealing with the effects it brings to the insurance system, which without measures will be led – slowly but surely – to collapse.

The latest data from ELSTAT as well as the reports of international organizations such as the OECD and the European Commission record the ominous picture of the worsening of the demographic problem.

Dealing with the impacts is complex: the OECD estimates that our country will have to increase the retirement age by almost 1.5 years by 2035 and by a total of 2.8 years by 2050.

The dilemma of increasing limits or collapsing remains, under the weight of the constantly worsening elements of the demographic problem. And this regardless of the individual measures that may be taken, in order to improve the parametric problems of the insurance.

Indicative are the figures according to which – if the acute national demographic problem is not resolved – in the year 2070, each person over the age of 65 will correspond to one – perhaps even less – person of working age, i.e. economically active.

Repeated reductions in pensions and increases in retirement limits become ineffective – over time – if no solutions are found to the acute demographic problem.

Today’s official picture of the ratio of employed pensioners shows that for every pensioner there are 1.5 workers, while fifteen years ago this ratio was close to one pensioner to two workers, when the insurance system was structured on the assumption that for every four workers there is a pensioner.

The studies

University studies list the dilemma between which – sooner or later – the country’s political system will be asked to choose: Shock measures or financing the system with additional resources amounting to 0.5% of GDP.

According to the academics Mr. S. Robolis (professor emeritus of Panteion University) and the actuary Mr. V. Betsi (Ph.D. at the same university) projecting today’s data into the year 2070, in that year “the workforce will be reduced to compared to 2020 by 29%, while pensioners will increase by 13% compared to 2020”.

The population of our country, in addition to being reduced, also appears to be extremely old. The elderly dependency ratio of 34.6 in 2019 is estimated to 59.9 in 2070. “This fact significantly affects, among others, sectors such as health care and the social insurance“, the two researchers estimate.

The two researchers’ demographic study estimates that life expectancy will increase – continuously – until 2065. It holds all other economic and demographic parameters constant. In this case, the social security system is estimated to be burdened, only due to the increase in life expectancy, by 49.4 billion euros.

Therefore, additional resources of 0.5% of GDP will have to be found to finance the burden on the system due to the increase in life expectancy.

Otherwise, nightmarish measures are required such as reducing pensions by 30%, increasing the retirement age to 73 years by 2060, increasing contributions for the main pension from the current 20% to 27% and the auxiliary from 6% to 8 ,1%.

Source: ot.gr

#Demographic #problem #Brings #measures #insurance

Related posts:

Demographic problem: Brings new measures to the insurance until 2070 – 2024-04-26 23:13:13

Related posts

Wall Avenue: euphoria over US inflation and Fed costs fades. And Dimon (JPMorgan) says watch out

Debacle for Swiss Re: Lack of billions with IptiQ?

Customs controls smuggling and illegal transportation of gold