The Supreme Court will intervene in the case of Correo Argentino after a strange maneuver that benefits Mauricio Macri | At the request of Socma, the file passed to the highest supreme court

Although the bankruptcy of Correo Argentino, room B of the Commercial Chamber yielded to a request from Socma and sent the file to the Supreme Court to decide whether the Superior Court of Justice of the City of Buenos Aires (TSJ) has jurisdiction to enter the case out the window as it did in June, when the company wanted to displace prosecutor Gabriela Boquin and judge Marta Cirulli. That is to say, in parallel to the bankruptcy process, now suspended, there is an open door for the Buenos Aires justice to interfere and even keep the file of the bankruptcy that gave rise to this intriguing and that has been in existence for 20 years.

The attempt by the Macri to intervene the Supreme Court of Buenos Aires, chaired by Inés Weinberg de Roca, an ally of the former president whom he tried to convert (without luck) into Attorney General, was part of the offensive to take Boquin out of play, the prosecutor who exposed all the maneuvers of the Post to not pay its millionaire debt, and Judge Cirulli. It was a cunning bet, which deepened a long-standing discussion about the possible transfer of the national courts to the City of Buenos Aires. Although this transfer was never made, nor was a law approved in this regard, the Supreme Court predicted that this will happen in the future and thus was awarded the possibility of intervening even in the bankruptcy.

The key is that the Post Office, but especially now its controlling partner Socma, trust in having allied judges in the courts of the City of Buenos Aires. For now, in the TSJ there are also Santiago Otamendi, former Vice Minister of Justice of Germán Garavano, and Vivian de Langhe, appointed in 2010 director of the Higher Institute of Public Security of the City, during the Macri administration.

The new decision of the chambermaids María Lilia Gómez Alonso de Díaz Cordero and Matilde Ballerini, caused surprise in court because in previous resolutions they had reaffirmed their jurisdiction before the Buenos Aires Court. This time they recognized a conflict that puts into play which court and jurisdiction should intervene before Socma’s request.

Although it seems like a technical subtlety, there are those who see a contradiction in the decision of the appeal court. At the same time, it is not a minor fact that the presentation is from this company (and no longer from the Post Office), because it is the one that is at risk of having to bear bankruptcy. He had also asked the TSJ to send everything to the Court, something that has not yet been resolved. Socma’s shareholders today are the brothers of Mauricio Macri and the children of his late sister Sandra Macri. Most of the package is held by Gianfranco Macri, investigated in other cases as the alleged front man of the former president.

What effect does this ruling on room B of the Commercial Chamber have?

  • Put in the hands of the Supreme Court a decision on the possible jurisdiction of the Buenos Aires Supreme Court regarding rulings issued by the national justice, in this case the national commercial jurisdiction in a bankruptcy and now in bankruptcy. The supremxs have another cause to resolve, very similar in the discussion about the competition, which in fact was invoked by their colleagues in the City to interfere in the issue of the Post: it is a civil lawsuit of the family of the plastic artist León Ferrari against the Panelist Gabriel Levinas, to whom he had given some paintings to exhibit in Paris in 2008, did not return them, said that he sold them and did not give him the money. A ruling ordered that he pay his heirs $ 88,000. In that same file the TSJ slipped a more than striking paragraph where it paved the way to also take charge of commercial jurisdiction files. It is rude from the legal point of view for the local / provincial justice to take responsibility for reviewing or absorbing cases from the national justice system.
  • There is a possibility that the referral to the Court is used as an excuse to stop the investigation into emptying maneuvers, manipulation of majorities and other fraud even with creditors, which is key to determining how the bankruptcy process progresses and the possibility of its extension to Socma, which the national State has already announced that it will request.
  • A shortcut is also opened for the Macri Group to continue with the dispute to transfer the entire commercial file to the Buenos Aires justice. The option is remote and far-fetched, but it was also the case for the TSJ to intervene, something that just happened. The purpose of the appeals before the Buenos Aires judges was to separate Judge Cirull and Prosecutor Boquin. Depending on what the Supreme Court decides, there will be possibilities or not to reissue that discussion.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.