Behind the smoke screen, nostalgia, curiosity and a convincing comeback: Mike Tyson made his return to the ring at 54, despite a draw conceded against Roy Jones Jr, 51, at a party on Saturday until then saved by Snoop Dogg. Expected with a mixture of excitement and excitement by lovers of the noble art, the exhibition between Tyson and Jones Jr did not disappoint. If no winner was chosen at the end of the eight rounds of two minutes – a duration which proved to be very reasonable, with all due respect to the original complaints of the protagonists – the two boxers showed that they still had some in gloves.
At the time of the decision’s announcement, Tyson appeared to be much cooler than Jones Jr., still sweaty and worn out from the “Blows to the body which wreaked havoc”, he confessed. “You took it well, because I sent you some.” I respect that “, replied “Iron Mike,” who thought he had won, but was satisfied with the result. “No one suits me!”, he assured, urging him to “Put it back”.
Dressed in flowing black shorts as in his heyday, Tyson was as expected the most aggressive, starting each round with a bang and advancing incessantly towards Jones Jr, more mobile, who was able to respond backwards with the tips of his gloves to Lakers colors, flocked with numbers 8 and 24 in tribute to Kobe Bryant, who died at the end of January in a helicopter crash.
Enough to inspire yet another punchline to Snoop Dogg, who had just performed a medley of his greatest hits, volutes of cannabis cigarettes in prime. “Looks like two of my uncles fighting over the barbecue!”, exclaimed the rapper, winner by KO in the comments facing the ex-boxer consultant Sugar Ray Leonard, hardly inspired.
Read alsoMike Tyson vs. Roy Jones Jr: Is It Reasonable?
Despite the “exhibition” framework set by the California Athletic Commission (CSAC) to preserve their physical integrity, the two boxers, prepared for several months and subjected to anti-doping tests, have, as promised, delivered a “Real fight”. Evidenced by this jab sent full face by Jones Jr at 2e round, Tyson’s two big left-right hooks on the body and temple at 5e, these blows also that he released after the gong of 3e, apologizing immediately by taking “tenderly” the head of his victim on his shoulder.
Neither lacked panache, and Tyson can be proud of his pathetic exit from 2005, when he lost his last professional fight to Irish stranger Kevin McBride. “I’m really happy with these eight times and even more so to have kept a distance. I was afraid of hurting myself. Why doesn’t anyone care about this for me? I haven’t done that for fifteen years ”, he said.
“We don’t play boxing”
Behind closed doors requires in these times of galloping pandemic, there were no raging fans in the stands of the Staples Center in Los Angeles, no electricity that usually spices up the big nights. So much so that it began in a certain embarrassment, in a very dark high-tech decorum, aimed at better highlighting the white ring, on which a sports betting site was displayed as sponsors, another serving cannabis directory (legalized in California).
Was it wanted? It’s Mario Lopez, comedian known for having played in the sitcom Saved by the Bell, which animated the evening, started with three other fights. The most anticipated by those who made him an internet star, opposed the Youtubeur to 20 million subscribers Jake Paul to former NBA basketball player Nate Robinson. And they were certainly not disappointed, since the first inflicted a severe knockout on the second, after a boxing parody. “Slow down nephew!” He climbed on basketball sneakers! ”, Snoop Dogg first started seeing Robinson’s eagerness to pounce on his opponent. “Ooh Lord! Call the ambulance! ”, he screamed, laughing after falling face down on the ground.
Motionless for a few moments, the former three-time winner of the All-Star Game dunk contest even worried Golden State Warriors point guard Stephen Curry, tweeting “Get over it Nate … come on man”. This sport is not a joke. Even Snoop Dogg, in whom humor does not preclude common sense, agreed: “We play basketball, we don’t play boxing”.
Donald Trump wants to pardon his friend and former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, involved in Russiagate and pleading guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with some Russian diplomats during the transition between the Obama administration and that Trump in 2016. The Axios website reports it. Trump reportedly reported his will to some of his closest collaborators.
Here is another double standard … 78-year-old Professor, who is shown as the leader of civilization of the Islamic segment. It turned out that Sadettin Ökten was given the “Culture and Art Grand Prize” by the Presidency. However, Prof. Sadettin Ökten is also among those who criticize the channel.
The Ministry of Interior launched an investigation against IMM President Ekrem İmamoğlu for posting a poster against the Kanal Istanbul Project, which was put into practice as a “State Project”. Looking at the data, it is seen that Kanal Istanbul will revive not the state, but specifically. The route starts from the point that separates the Marmara Sea from Küçükçekmece Lake, continues along the Sazlıdere Dam Basin, passes Sazlıbosna Village, reaches the east of Dursunköy and passes Baklalı Village, then reaches the Black Sea east of Terkos Lake.
The route starts from Küçükçekmece Lake and reaches the Black Sea. The places marked in red on the map show that the parcels are privately owned.
152 MILLION SQUARE METERS
According to the property analysis of the project on the route, most of the land in the 45-kilometer-long region seems to be owned by individuals and companies. There are 8 thousand 300 parcels on the route of the Kanal Istanbul project. 5 thousand 908 of these parcels, in other words 71 percent, are private property. 7 percent have shares belonging to companies that are partners with other public institutions. The route through which Kanal Istanbul will pass covers an area of 152 million square meters.
THEY WANT 800 BILLION DOLLAR RENT
Every day, new objections and reactions to Kanal Istanbul are added. Medet Güney, General Secretary of the Chamber of Environmental Engineers Istanbul Branch made striking claims.
According to the report of DW Turkish, Güney said: “Beyond being a channel project, Kanal Istanbul is a new city project. There is a profit of 800 billion dollars coming from here. The main concern of the government is to take this profit. We can understand from the terms in the project that the people in that area will move away. It will not only be with people, it will also drive the creatures in the region away from their living spaces.
HERE ARE THE DETAILS OF THE NEW CITY
Work has been completed for the new city project to be built around the canal. According to the plan, agricultural lands in Arnavutköy are open to construction. It is aimed to establish a technology base on an area of 2.2 million square meters next to the airport. A place has been designed in the Baklalı region where activities for health tourism can take place.
BIG AWARD TO THAT PROFESSOR
While an investigation was initiated against IMM President Ekrem İmamoğlu for opposing Kanal Istanbul the previous day, Prof. Sadettin Ökten was given the 2020 ‘Culture and Art Grand Prize’ by the Presidency.
Last year, Erdogan gave Ökten the “Goodness Award”. This year will give a cultural award.
Shown as the “leader of the civilization of the Islamic segment,” Prof. Ökten said, “The fans of Kanal Istanbul know that they will earn good money from this and therefore they want the project to be implemented. Excavation work in engineering pays very well and is very open to abuse. It is obvious that the change this will make will be great. Thinking about it scares me. Right now, the leaders of the AKP are people aged 50-60. If these skyscrapers were built, they would not have been erected, and Mr. Tayyip would not even think of Kanal Istanbul. ” Sadettin Öktem, 78, graduated from ITU Civil Engineering, drew attention with his researches on Islamic civilization.
Sadettin Öktem is shown as the “leader of the Islamic segment”.
ÖKTEN HAPPENED THE CHANNEL IN THE BOOK THIS IS:
Ökten said, “The change will be big. “It scares me,” he said.
After considering several places in Paris, it was finally the May-Picqueray garden that was selected. Very few should be able to locate on a map of the capital this green space saluting the memory of an anar activist of the last century (who was also José Bové’s secretary and … Libé). But geolocation becomes easier when we know that it was previously identified under the name of Square du Bataclan. It is therefore on its gates that will be presented, from this commemorative Friday, the photographs of “Paris, November 13 – From day to day …”
An artistic project that was designed in consultation with the association 13onze15 Fraternité et Truth, created by victims of the attacks in Paris and Saint-Denis. Which only retrieved one image, among all those previously submitted for its approval: we saw two armed cops, stashed behind a car, each looking in opposite directions. Too violent and evocative.
Led by Laura Serani and Camille Morin, the exhibition and the copious catalog (300 pages, enriched with numerous testimonials, including an interview with François Hollande) bring together forty-two leading names, French and international, who were asked to provide two photographs: one taken before the fateful night, symbolizing in their eyes the life before, possibly mixed with“Carelessness and levity” (even though Islamist terrorism had already sown desolation in the recent past); and the other, after the tragedy, deserving to be interpreted as “An act of resistance […] echo of sorrows, fears, but also hope, revolt and resilience ”. All complemented by a text explaining the choice, or telling the story of the fatal evening as it was experienced by the authors of whom we discover, incidentally, that many were hanging around at the time of the facts in the area – reputedly friendly sector, between terraces and restaurants, where it was good to extend the day spent at the Paris Photo festival, which had opened its doors the day before.
From a detailed examination of the selection, we will note that several had a very elastic interpretation of the chronology of the specifications, like Catherine Poncin, Todd Hido, Hicham Gardaf; or Sabine Weiss who, prerogative of age and iconic status (?), sent a night photo of the Concorde obelisk dated 1950 and, for the more recent part (sic), an embracing couple on the first floor of a restaurant in Montmartre in… 1953. The commentary, on the other hand, does not tolerate any apocryphal interpretation: “I no longer understand this world that I have embraced so much.”
This benign compromise pinned down, the common goodwill suffers no challenge, which, once overcome the stupor (this group of appalled friends, gathered in an apartment, by Nicola Lo Calzo), favors a sincerely cathartic overview, from Hannah Whitaker’s nurturing breast, to Frédéric Stucin’s flowering tree.
“Paris, November 13, 2015 – From overnight…”, exhibition on the gates of the May-Picqueray garden, 75011. Free entry, until March 11. Catalog to eds. 13onze15 / The Wall Projects.
The entertainment journalist, Gustavo Adolfo Infante, reported that after José José’s will was read, Anel Noreña was declared as the universal heir to the fortune of the “Prince of Song”; Sara Sosa and her daughter would remain from the inheritance.
Saltillo, November 7 (Vanguardia) .- After they found the will that he left passed away singer Jose jose, it has been stated that the only universal heir of the musician’s fortune is nothing more and nothing less than Anore Noreña mother of Jose Joel Y Marysol Sosa.
During the program First hand, the entertainment journalist, Gustavo Adolfo Infante, He reported that Anore Noreña had been named as the universal heir to “The Prince of Song”.
THE HERITAGE OF JOSÉ JOSÉ
Likewise, the communicator stated that José José left two properties in Florida, United States and all the royalties from his songs as assets.
For her part, Laura Nuñez, friend and workers of the deceased singer confirmed this information and said that the process of claiming the inheritance is just beginning.
It should be noted that Anel Noreña would become the heir to everything that “El Príncipe de la Canción” left while Sara Sosa and her daughter Sarita would be left out of the will and have no interference in the inheritance.
THIS CONTENT IS PUBLISHED BY SINEMBARGO WITH EXPRESS STATE-OF-THE-ART AUTHORIZATION. SEE ORIGINAL HERE. ITS REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED.
After testing positive, actress Consuelo Duval wanted to leave everything prepared for his something to happen to him because of it so he decided to prepare in advance his willIs it that you feel that your end is coming?
Just a few weeks ago the comedian Consuelo Duval announced that she had positive to the terrible virus that has worried everyone since the beginning of this year, and it has been so much his fear and anguish that he has decided to leave everything ready.
However, a few days ago the actress celebrated with great happiness that she was finally free of the virus so she returned to work and much more relieved she conducted an interview with the media where she shared the minor of what she lived during those days when the virus was inside his body.
That was how he commented that there were certain moments when he thought to the worst and felt that I couldn’t go on more alive.
Consuelo revealed that she lived through very strong and complicated moments during her battle against the coronavirus, since she was very afraid of the disease.
What a chin ..! God bless you, please do not stop wearing the mask. It was a disease that I was terrified of and it caught up with me, and I was paralyzed for a little while … Apart from the girl who sent me the result, she said: ‘I’m very sorry’ and there I felt like my legs were bending and then It said ‘positive’ and then it said ‘very high viral load.’
Despite the fact that her entire family was always on the lookout for her health, she had to spend a lot of time alone with really strong symptoms, since the virus lodged in her brain which caused lights to appear at night when she closed her eyes. like strobes.
It lodged in my brain, so at night it had bizarre lights when I closed and opened my eyes. The only thing I remember is that one night I hugged myself and said ‘let’s get out of this’. It even makes me want to cry, but I did say ‘I’m going to get out of this,’ “she recalled.
In addition, the also comedian, came to think about death and although she assures that she felt calm and grateful with her life, she wanted to leave her will ready in case her time to leave came.
I did it before, since we put ourselves at risk, I said: ‘if the bug catches me and takes me into the arms of Daddy God, my will’ … I put everything in order, I let the people I love know how much I love and that’s it, but here I am, I believe that Diosito is going to give me many more opportunities “.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel and get more from Show News!
It was with a very hopeful message that Consuelo Duval shared a photograph to her followers with whom she celebrates having won the battle after testing positive for the virus.
Today I smile with my soul again !!! … I have been discharged and the covid is NO longer in my body !!
In that publication, the celebrity also took the opportunity to make his followers aware not to lower their guard and continue with measures such as the use of masks and constant hand washing.
As expected, the news made her followers very happy, since Consuelo is one of the most beloved of the medium since her smile and charisma on the screen has managed to catch millions of Mexicans.
It should be noted that Consuelo Duval and Omar Chaparro were infected within the Televisa forums, where they record the episodes of the program Who is the mask? and it was even pointed out that the youtuber Juanpa Zurita had been the culprit of the infections that began to exist within the forums.
It may interest you: He wins the battle, Consuelo Duval shares, she was discharged
Film of Argentine origin directed by Eduardo Crespo, which tells the story of a family that loses one of its members. Romina Escobar, Rodrigo Santana, Jésica Frickel and Giovanni Pelizzari are the protagonists.
He has decided to go on a tour to meet with the union’s territorial officials because he believes that his organization should get back to cruising speed. The pandemic and the state of alarm have also affected them. So much so that their statutes do not include the possibility of holding a telematic congress and there they are mulling over the matter, because although they have delayed it until May, they do not know very well how it is going to be that of bringing hundreds of people together in the same place. Pepe Álvarez, the secretary general of the General Union of Workers, is in a critical phase with the Government. You think they move slowly on some things; you notice them lagging in changes that, in your opinion, should already have occurred; and he even begins to think that the CEOE has gained influence in La Moncloa and its surroundings. He does not understand the delay in the reform of the labor reform, and he shows him on guard and more than willing to battle in the chapter on pensions.
– ERTE, until when?
– They must last as long as the pandemic.
– At a brutal cost.
– Yes, but if you do not spend it in the ERTE you will have to do it in unemployment, hence the expense is inevitable. The effort that the country has made to try to maintain the greatest number of companies, and with it the greatest possible employment, cannot be thrown away. And in relation to the cost, the State is going to receive a loan of 21,000 million to 30 years and without interest. Da to finance it.
– Good, no time limit. But you do not seem in favor of negotiating long-term conditions but of a review from time to time, perhaps quarterly.
– Indeed, I think we must be clear that they will be extended, but the specific conditions are worth reviewing frequently. Agree now and review in December is something that seems logical to us because no one is capable of making forecasts in this scenario and the changes are meteoric.
– And without discounts …
– It is that thinking that you are going to lower the perception of someone who charges 1,000 euros a month is absurd. The regulation of ERTE was not intended for a pandemic and that issue must be remedied.
– The negotiation of apparently simple things goes on forever. Also in this case.
– In this country we like to debate so much … There are days when I think the Government wants to entertain us with these things so as not to enter others that are waiting on the table.
– They are now entangled in trying to agree on a telework regulation. It is necessary?
– Essential. Although there is a part that should be left to collective bargaining, in a country full of SMEs it is necessary that at least the fundamental aspects are regulated by law. The bargain that has meant for companies is going to end. There have been no entry or exit times; the worker has had to bear all the costs, including those of remodeling the furniture in his house to create a workspace.
– The big difference seems to be in when it is considered teleworking.
– Negotiating with the CEOE on this matter is not being easy. We have already yielded enough by admitting that it is considered teleworking from 20%. That is, from one day a week. Aspiring to 30%, a day and a half, seems excessive. More of a joke. There is a risk that we will end up in the negotiation and that must also be stopped. It shouldn’t be past the end of September. But we prefer to bet on the pact, because it guarantees something lasting.
– The Government promised a long time ago to reverse the labor reform. Do you find any justification for the delay?
– There are some who believe that this government is very left-wing. We believe not so much. The labor reform? It’s simple, there is no political will to do it, nothing more. There is the necessary parliamentary backing to do so. The PSOE talks a lot about this when there is an electoral campaign, then it dissolves. And Unidos Podemos has more will, but it has the weight it does.
– Do you think that businessmen have gained influence in the Executive?
– That exists and is growing. In these years, many multi-service companies have grown that see their business in danger with the reform and put pressure on their own. And then there is this that there is a commitment with the European Commission. No one really tells me where that commitment is written …
– Has the new deadline been believed to be done before the end of the year?
– If it were to believe … What I do guarantee is that we will do our best to make it so. Otherwise we will consolidate as a third country.
– And there is also the pension melon …
– Just as I hope that employers do not take advantage of the pandemic to make excessive adjustments, I also hope that the Government will not take advantage of it on the issue of pensions.
– Afraid of a cut?
– If the Government intends to hack into pensions, don’t count on us. Another thing is that details can be discussed, formulas that contemplate flexible conditions. Everything can be discussed, but without axes. Spain spends little on pensions, barely 10% of its GDP. Germany or Italy are at 13%. Our problem is therefore not in spending, although we must also take out of Social Security some things that do not make sense there, but income. By the way, what does the Bank of Spain think about pensions?
– We are on the verge of an adjustment process in many companies. Some voices defend that before assuming cuts in the workforce it is preferable to opt for a generalized cut in wages.
– I am not saying that in any specific case this scenario is admissible and if someone shows us, with data in hand, that this is the case, we can study it. But Spain does not have a high wage problem. Unlike. In addition, there will always be a country further south willing to do things cheaper. The key is to bet on technology. You also have to be careful with the energy transition.
– What do you mean exactly?
– I find a wild transition like the one that is intended unacceptable. That areas of Spain that have contributed a lot to the country with their energy-related companies can remain empty is… unfair. That the closure of mines or power plants with a “there you stay”, with no alternative, is not admissible. In that of empty Spain the ideas are not clear.
The ordeal of Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov started the May 26, 1922, as he got up after a placid dream. On what should have been a normal morning, the Soviet leader began to vomit violently. When the doctor arrived, the diagnosis was not flattering: stroke. The ailment in question paralyzed one side of his body, prevented him from speaking for a few days, and diminished his mental faculties. As an example, just a few days later, it was impossible for him to multiply twelve by seven. “He couldn’t do it and was very depressed. He struggled for three hours and solved it by sums, “his sister later confirmed.
That was the culmination of several months of lack of energy, headaches and bad mood. Or, ultimately, of “mortality symptoms”, as defined Victor Sebestyen in “Lenin, a biography” (Attic of the books, 2020); a conscientious work in which he reviews the life of the Bolshevik through what his relatives, companions and enemies wrote of him. The stroke changed his perspective on existence. From then on he understood that the Grim Reaper lurked and that, sooner or later, he would be forced to leave with her hand in hand. So he took action and dictated, little by little, in intervals of a few minutes, his political will.
Lenin, who had always fostered infighting between his two acolytes, Iosif Stalin and Leon Trotsky, considering that they housed great talent, also suffered a revelation after the stroke. Although he did not organize his succession, he did make clear in his last wishes that the first, then secretary general of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, should be separated from office due to its great voracity for power. The dying man was no longer considerate of those around him, including himself Trotsky (with whom he had already had several quarrels in the past) Grigory Zinoviev (Comintern head) or Lev Kamenev (vice president of Sovnarkom).
If he had remained in the realm of the living longer, Lenin would have corroborated suspicions that everyone was driven by a desire for power. But he died ten months later, after an extensive agony during which he could not communicate with his wife, Nadia, who read to him at the foot of the bed every night. He left this world on January 21, 1924, a day when, as his friend Nikolái Bujarin explained, “he was in a good mood” and had fun while “a group of farm workers went hunting.” Hours later, already in his bed, he began to bleed and, at about seven in the afternoon, his last breath expired.
As Sebestyen well explains in his work, Lenin left as his last poisoned gift a testament full of rancor, hatred and warnings about his former colleagues. A kind of time bomb that could explode and kill them all if it was known to the people. Therefore, they made the decision to hide it to minimize risks. The text could only be read, fragmented, three years later. Its full version, leaked by the New York Times in 1926, was hidden by him. Stalin (the most affected if it came to light) until 1956, when Nikita Khrushchev revealed its content during a speech in which he charged against his predecessor.
Writing and hatreds
Lenin, desperate and eager for someone to get him cyanide to end his life after suffering the first stroke (two others would come later), dictated his will between the December 22, 1922 and January 4, 1923. The one in charge of typing it was one of his secretaries, Maria Volódicheva. Sebestyen is in favor of seeing the death close, the Bolshevik leader recovered “the customs of his conspiratorial past” and insisted that the document should remain hidden and locked until after his death. In short, he did not trust that any of his party comrades tried to influence him if he knew its content before.
“At his request, five copies were prepared. One he kept, three copies [debían] indulge in Nadezhda Konstantinova and another, marked “strictly secret,” to the secretary, “said his wife. The drafts were burned and the rest of the documents sealed in envelopes. The idea was that if someone opened them before his death, the Soviet leader would take notice of it and could change his last wills at will. However, the reality is that it is more than likely that Stalin knew, at least, the existence of the report, since he was in charge of selecting the doctors and nurses who treated the patient and Lenin’s assistants worked, in the end, also for him.
The first fragment of the will was issued on December 24, and was one of the longest. To begin with, he charged Stalin head-on: “Comrade Stalin, who has become secretary-general, he has concentrated immeasurable power in his hands, and I’m not sure he knows how to use power with enough caution at all times ». Instead, he was praising himself Trotsky, whom he described as “the most capable man in the current Central Committee of the party”. In the later sections he also analyzed the key figures within the USSR, among them Zinoviev and Kamenev (of which he did not speak excessively well) and made general comments about the address after his death.
A few days later, on January 4, he summoned his secretary to add a curious postscript in the will. The most painful for Stalin:
“Stalin is too rude and this defect, although quite tolerable in our environment and in the dealings between us, the Communists, becomes intolerable in a secretary-general. So I suggest that comrades think about how to remove Stalin from office and appoint another man in his place who, in all other respects, differs from Comrade Stalin in one advantage, namely that he is more tolerant, more loyal, more Courteous, more considerate of other comrades and less capricious.
That paragraph supposed the materialization of a fight between both that extended for years. A tug-of-war that, incidentally, had not been important until then for a Lenin who, according to the author of this new biography, knew the “Ruthless immorality” of his subordinate, but never made a move to stop it. “Lenin created the monster, and his greatest crime was leaving Stalin with good prospects of becoming the Soviet dictator,” adds Sebestyen in his work. In practice, and according to different historians, that simple footnote supposed the political death of Iosif.
He cannot be reproached for changing his mind in this regard. In mid-January, the dying man learned that Stalin had mounted a campaign to crush Georgian nationalism. His goal: that all power emanate from a central and powerful Moscow, something that Lenin did not share. He, through his wife, sent a personal note to all his followers to root that out. Not only was it useless, but his enemy found out about it and called Nadia on the phone warning that he would suffer severe consequences. The answer was immediate, on the part of the political prostrate:
“You have been so rude as to call my wife on the phone and address her in an inappropriate tone, [… Aunque ella te diga que está dispuesta a olvidarlo, […] I have no intention of forgetting so easily what is done against me, and it goes without saying that whoever attacks my wife attacks me. Therefore, I ask you to reflect on whether you are willing to withdraw what you have said and apologize, or if you prefer that our relationship be broken.
Lenin’s death brought a logical end to those quarrels that Stalin tried to deal with to avoid direct confrontation. The internal differences in the party were also not aired outward in order not to show weakness. When the fatal day arrived, nobody could suspect the tension that existed within the party. On January 23, the coffin was warmly received by thousands upon thousands of citizens in Moscow, the burning chapel was visited on a massive scale, and the guard had to be doubled twice to organize the entire crowd. The newspapers of that time confirmed that he was icy cold and unbearableBut it didn’t matter. It was time to say goodbye.
But the love for Lenin was not replicated in the troika that, at the head of Stalin, Kámanev and Zinoviev, now ran the country. These, in Sebestyen’s words, ensured that the will never see the light. They made it. Nadia, despite her efforts, was unable to make the content known to the people and was only able, allegedly, to leak it to the international media. “All the contenders for leadership had something to lose if the will was made public, although obviously Stalin would be the hardest hit. The text, in the end, showed that Lenin did not have true faith in any of the comrades who surrounded him, “adds the expert in his work.
The will remained hidden. Or, at least, its most controversial parts. Two weeks after his death, Kamenev read some excerpts during a meeting of the Congress, but not the last paragraph. Seven years before Stalin acquired dictatorial powers, the Central Committee He had access to the full text, but, perhaps out of fear, or perhaps out of conviction, he gave his support to the reviled secretary-general. Although, yes, it once again hid its content from society. The people only knew the truth in 1956. No less than three decades after the Bolshevik left this world after an intense agony.