Saturday, December 7, 2019
Home News Sandy Hook may continue her lawsuit against the gun maker

Sandy Hook may continue her lawsuit against the gun maker

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to protect a major weapons maker from any potential liability during a school shootout in 2012, killing 26 people and 26 teachers and educators in Newtown, Connecticut.

The action of the judges authorizes a legal action brought by parents of victims of elementary school Sandy Hook to act at the state level, on the basis of an allegation that Remington Arms Co. would have marketed the military-type rifle used during the large-scale shootings "for use in assaults against human beings".

The case tests the scope of a 2005 law passed by Congress to protect gun makers from any liability for crimes committed by gun buyers. The law was hailed by the National Rifle Association, but it included exceptions, including a violation of the marketing and advertising rules.

Supporters of gun control said that a family victory in the long-standing dispute could result in more lawsuits and damaging revelations regarding the firearms sector.

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in March that Remington could be sued because of the way the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle was marketed. The family lawsuit argues that Remington glorified his weapon in a youth-directed advertisement, including violent video games.

In 2013, a Connecticut state police inspector presented a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, of the same make and model as that used by Adam Lanza during the elementary school shootings. Sandy Hook, at a legislative hearing in Hartford.

Adam Lanza, Sandy Hook's killer, was 20 years old when he killed his mother at home, then went to Newtown School and shot dead first graders and educators. Lanza is then killed.

The Supreme Court already has a record on the rights of firearms. This case, to be heard in early December, will decide whether a New York City bylaw restricting the transport of legally owned firearms violates the constitutional rights of their owners.

In the newspapers, Donald Verrilli, the family lawyer who was suing Remington, said his publicity "continued to exploit the fantasy of a lone, all-conquering shooter, proclaiming:" The forces of Opposition, bend yourself. You alone are more numerous than others. ""

Scott Keller, Remington's attorney, told the court that, under the 2005 federal statute, the trial "is exactly the kind of case resulting from the misuse of a firearm by a criminal who "may not be brought before any federal or regional court".


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Popular

Best Grubhub Order in All States in 2019

The Grubhub Food Delivery Service, owner of Seamless and other food-related brands, has released its Year in Food Report, revealing the best orders placed...

When will bowl games be announced?

CLOSEAutomatic readingThumbnails posterShow captionsLast slide Next slideThe schedule of the university football bowl is expected to be announced Sunday.Some notable things: the PFC semifinals...

A teenager from Lorton died in an accident in Maryland; suspected alcohol as a factor

A 17-year-old boy from Lorton, Va., Was killed in a road accident on Highway 301 in Maryland and police believe that alcohol could have...

Recent Comments