Edited by John Tranquada, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY; received February 17, 2023; accepted July 22, 2023
August 22, 2023
120 (35) e2302800120
Significance
Characterizing the symmetries of ordered phases is paramount in the study of strongly correlated electron systems, and anisotropic lattice distortion/strain offer a fruitful avenue for probing and tuning these phases. Our experimental framework resolves symmetric (rotation–symmetry–preserving) and antisymmetric (rotation–symmetry–breaking) strain effects in free energy using a thermodynamic quantity, the elastocaloric effect. By tracing out the entropy landscape of an f-electron intermetallic in the temperature–strain plane, we demonstrate that the strain-even (odd) component of the elastocaloric response corresponds to symmetric (antisymmetric) lattice deformation modes distinctively coupled to the underlying electronic degrees of freedom. Along with the derived Ehrenfest relation, the elastocaloric effect has potential applications in placing experimental constraints on the spatial symmetry of wider classes of emergent phases in quantum materials.
Abstract
The adiabatic elastocaloric effect measures the temperature change of a given system with strain and provides a thermodynamic probe of the entropic landscape in the temperature-strain space. Here, we demonstrate that the DC bias strain-dependence of AC elastocaloric effect allows decomposition of the latter into symmetric (rotation-symmetry-preserving) and antisymmetric (rotation-symmetry-breaking) strain channels, using a tetragonal -electron intermetallic DyBC—whose antiferroquadrupolar order breaks local fourfold rotational symmetries while globally remaining tetragonal—as a showcase example. We capture the strain evolution of its quadrupolar and magnetic phase transitions using both singularities in the elastocaloric coefficient and its jumps at the transitions, and the latter we show follows a modified Ehrenfest relation. We find that antisymmetric strain couples to the underlying order parameter in a biquadratic (linear-quadratic) manner in the antiferroquadrupolar (canted antiferromagnetic) phase, which are attributed to a preserved (broken) global tetragonal symmetry, respectively. The broken tetragonal symmetry in the magnetic phase is further evidenced by elastocaloric strain-hysteresis and optical birefringence. Additionally, within the staggered quadrupolar order, the observed elastocaloric response reflects a quadratic increase of entropy with antisymmetric strain, analogous to the role magnetic field plays for Ising antiferromagnetic orders by promoting pseudospin flips. Our results demonstrate AC elastocaloric effect as a compact and incisive thermodynamic probe into the coupling between electronic degrees of freedom and strain in free energy, which holds the potential for investigating and understanding the symmetry of a wide variety of ordered phases in broader classes of quantum materials.
Get full access to this article
Purchase, subscribe or recommend this article to your librarian.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Acknowledgments
We thank R.M. Fernandes and A.P. Mackenzie for fruitful discussions. Experimental work performed at Stanford University was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation EPiQS Initiative, grant GBMF9068. L.Y. also acknowledges support by the Marvin Chodorow Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University. M.D.B. acknowledges support by the Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials Fellowship. Optical measurements were performed at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory as part of the Quantum Materials program, Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. V.S. is supported by the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, UC Berkeley. J.O. and Y.S. received support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through Grant GBMF4537 to J.O. at UC Berkeley. J.F.R.-N. acknowledges support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through Grants GBMF4302 and GBMF8686.
Author contributions
L.Y. and I.R.F. designed research; L.Y., Y.S., V.S., M.S.I., T.W., and M.D.B. performed research; L.Y., J.F.R.-N. and M.E.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; L.Y., Y.S., V.S., and J.O. analyzed data; and L.Y. and I.R.F. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Supporting Information
References
1
J. Olsen et al., Superconductivity under pressure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 36168 (1964).
2
C. W. Hicks, M. E. Barber, S. D. Edkins, D. O. Brodsky, A. P. Mackenzie, Piezoelectric-based apparatus for strain tuning. Rev. Sci. Inst. 85065003 (2014).
3
C. W. Hicks et al., Strong increase of T of SrRuO under both tensile and compressive strain. Science 344283–285 (2014).
4
A. Steppke et al., Strong peak in T of SrRuO under uniaxial pressure. Science 355eaaf9398 (2017).
5
E. Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems. Science 309257–262 (2005).
6
P. Malinowski et al., Suppression of superconductivity by anisotropic strain near a nematic quantum critical point. Nat. Phys. 161189–1193 (2020).
7
I. Kostylev, S. Yonezawa, Z. Wang, Y. Ando, Y. Maeno, Uniaxial-strain control of nematic superconductivity in SrBiSe. Nat. Common. 111–8 (2020).
8
T. Worasaran et al., Nematic quantum criticality in an Fe-based superconductor revealed by strain-tuning. Science 372973–977 (2021).
9
H. H. Kim et al., Uniaxial pressure control of competing orders in a high-temperature superconductor. Science 3621040–1044 (2018).
10
J. Straquadine, M. Ikeda, I. Fisher, Evidence for realignment of the charge density wave state in ErTe and TmTe under uniaxial stress via elastocaloric and elastoresistivity measurements. Phys. Rev. X 12021046 (2022).
12
JF Nye, Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices (Oxford University Press, 1985).
13
B. Lüthi, Physical Acoustics in the Solid State (Springer Science& Business Media, 2007), vol. 148.
14
M. S. Ikeda et al., Symmetric and antisymmetric strain as continuous tuning parameters for electronic nematic order. Phys. Rev. B 98245133 (2018).
15
M. Shapiro, P. Hlobil, A. Hristov, A. V. Maharaj, I. Fisher, Symmetry constraints on the elastoresistivity tensor. Phys. Rev. B 92235147 (2015).
16
P. Wiecki et al., Dominant in-plane symmetric elastoresistance in CsFeAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125187001 (2020).
17
L. Wang et al., Electronic nematicity in URuAnd revisited. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124257601 (2020).
18
E. W. Rosenberg, J. H. Chu, J. P. Ruff, A. T. Hristov, I. R. Fisher, Divergence of the quadrupole-strain susceptibility of the electronic nematic system YbRuGe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1167232–7237 (2019).
19
H. Yamauchi et al., Antiferroquadrupolar ordering and magnetic properties of the tetragonal DyBC compound. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 682057–2066 (1999).
20
A. V. Maharaj et al., Transverse fields to tune an Ising-nematic quantum phase transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 11413430–13434 (2017).
21
K. I. Kugel, D. Khomskiĭ, The Jahn–Teller effect and magnetism: Transition metal compounds. Sov. Phys. Usp. 25231 (1982).
22
Y. Murakami et al., Resonant X-ray scattering from orbital ordering in LaMnO . Phys. Rev. Lett. 81582 (1998).
23
J. D. Axe et al., Structural phase transformations and superconductivity in LaBaCuO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 622751–2754 (1989).
24
M. Fujita, H. Goka, K. Yamada, J. M. Tranquada, L. P. Regnault, Stripe order, depinning, and fluctuations in LaBaCuO and LaBaSrCuO. Phys. Rev. B 70104517 (2004).
25
P. Santini et al., Multipolar interactions in -electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81807–863 (2009).
26
M. S. Ikeda et al., Ac elastocaloric effect as a probe for thermodynamic signatures of continuous phase transitions. Rev. Know Instrument 90083902 (2019).
27
Y. S. Li et al., Elastocaloric determination of the phase diagram of SrRuO. Nature 607276–280 (2022).
28
M. S. Ikeda et al., Elastocaloric signature of nematic fluctuations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118e2105911118 (2021).
29
P. Present, Grüneisen parameter studies on heavy fermion quantum criticality. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79114502 (2016).
30
L. Squillante, I. F. Mello, A. C. Seridonio, M. de Souza, Elastocaloric-effect-induced adiabatic magnetization in paramagnetic salts due to the mutual interactions. Sci. Rep. 111–10 (2021).
31
H. Yamauchi, T. Osakabe, M. Kosaka, E. Matsuoka, H. Onodera, High-pressure studies of DyBC. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 622084–2087 (2013).
32
D. Jayalakshmi, E. Viswanathan, M. Sundareswari, D. Hemanand, Theoretical investigation of thermoelectric property and damage tolerance of LuBC compound. Comput. Condens. Matter 28e00566 (2021).
33
U. Staub et al., Orbital dynamics of the 4 shell in DyBC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94036408 (2005).
34
Y. Tanaka et al., Evidence of antiferroquadrupolar ordering of DyBC. J. Phys. Condens. Matte r 11L505 (1999).
35
O. Zaharko, W. Sikora, F. Bialas, U. Staub, T. Nakamura, Quadrupolar, structural, and magnetic ordering in DyBC studied by symmetry analysis and neutron diffraction. Phys. Rev. B 69224417 (2004).
36
L. Ye et al., Data for Manuscript “Elastocaloric signatures of symmetric and antisymmetric strain-tuning of quadrupolar and magnetic phases in DyB2C2”. Stanford Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.25740/wy533np2837. Deposited 1 August 2023.
37
L. Testardi, Elastic modulus, thermal expansion, and specific heat at a phase transition. Phys. Rev. B 123849 (1975).
38
E. Du Tremolet de Lacheisserie, D. Gignoux, M. Schlenker, eds., Magnetism: I. Fundamentals (Springer, New York, NY, 2002).
39
R. M. Fernandes, J. Schmalian, Manifestations of nematic degrees of freedom in the magnetic, elastic, and superconducting properties of the iron pnictides. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25084005 (2012).
40
J. M. Bartlett et al., Relationship between transport anisotropy and nematicity in FeSe. Phys. Rev. X 11021038 (2021).
41
A. Little et al., Three-state nematicity in the triangular lattice antiferromagnet Fe/3NbS. Night. Mater. 191062–1067 (2020).
42
A. Hubert, R. Schäfer, Magnetic Domains: The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures (Springer Science& Business Media, 2008).
43
T. Yanagisawa et al., Dilatometric measurements and multipole ordering in DyBC and HoBC. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 741666–1669 (2005).
44
G. Gehring, K. Gehring, Co-operative Jahn–Teller effects. Rep. Prog. Phys. 381 (1975).
45
J. Ziman, Antiferromagnetism by the Bethe method. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 641108 (1951).
46
A. Beath, D. Ryan, Fcc antiferromagnetic Ising model in a uniform external field solved by mean-field theory. Phys. Rev. B 72014455 (2005).
47
E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, M. J. Lawler, J. P. Eisenstein, A. P. Mackenzie, Nematic fermi fluids in condensed matter physics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1153–178 (2010).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 120 | No. 35
August 29, 2023
Classifications
Copyright
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Submission history
Received: February 17, 2023
Accepted: July 22, 2023
Published online: August 22, 2023
Published in issue: August 29, 2023
Keywords
- antisymmetric strain
- quadrupolar order
- elastocaloric effect
- strongly correlated electron systems
Acknowledgments
We thank R.M. Fernandes and A.P. Mackenzie for fruitful discussions. Experimental work performed at Stanford University was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation EPiQS Initiative, grant GBMF9068. L.Y. also acknowledges support by the Marvin Chodorow Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University. M.D.B. acknowledges support by the Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials Fellowship. Optical measurements were performed at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory as part of the Quantum Materials program, Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. V.S. is supported by the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, UC Berkeley. J.O. and Y.S. received support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through Grant GBMF4537 to J.O. at UC Berkeley. J.F.R.-N. acknowledges support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through Grants GBMF4302 and GBMF8686.
Author Contributions
L.Y. and I.R.F. designed research; L.Y., Y.S., V.S., M.S.I., T.W., and M.D.B. performed research; L.Y., J.F.R.-N. and M.E.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; L.Y., Y.S., V.S., and J.O. analyzed data; and L.Y. and I.R.F. wrote the paper.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
*
We note that a linear-dependence of with pressure may also arise from a mutual cancelation between quadratic terms of the two independent components and while this requires an unlikely degree of fine-tuning. As a second note, only puts constraints on the free energy close to phase transitions; we hypothesize that when is not strongly modified by and terms are excluded near the phase transition, the presence of such terms in the free energy away from is also unlikely.
†
The black solid curve is scaled along the temperature axis by a factor of 4, which we hypothesize originates from an imperfect adiabaticity of our experiments.
‡
To quantitatively compare with in Fig. 4Ban additional factor 2.3 is required in front of . We note that this factor introduced to account for imperfect adiabaticity is comparable with that used above for . The difference between the two factors may arise from a -dependence of the thermal conditions (thus the adiabaticity) of the experimental setup.
Authors
Affiliations
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Thanapat Worasaran
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Matthew E. Sorensen
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Maja D. Bachmann
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Notes
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citation statements
Altmetrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
View Options
Get Access
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDF
Media
Figures
Tables
Other