The new Infection Protection Act with rules for 3G at work, on buses and trains goes into effect this Wednesday. It was published in the Federal Law Gazette on Tuesday. On Monday, Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier signed the law with the new Corona requirements.

[Beliebt auf tagesspiegel.de: Wie gut wirkt meine Corona­Impfung noch, wann brauche ich den Booster? Die Antwort gibt der Tagesspiegel-Impfschutzrechner]

The controversial law presented by the SPD, Greens and FDP provides for 3G in the workplace as well as in buses and trains to combat the corona pandemic. Here you either have to prove that you have been vaccinated or recovered or you have to present a current negative corona test. All important questions about the new 3G regulation in the workplace:

Who does the 3G rule apply to in the workplace?

The requirements include both employees and, for example, civil servants, judges or soldiers. That According to the Federal Ministry of Labor, home office is not a “place of work”, as well as jobs in vehicles.


Otherwise, the 3G rule not only includes, for example, the office, but also places outdoors on the company premises. Construction sites are also considered workplaces, as are storage rooms, canteens or accommodation.

How is 3G controlled?

Basically, employees and employers themselves are only allowed to enter a workplace if they have proof of their 3G status with them. There are only two exceptions: either to be tested in the workplace or to be vaccinated. According to the Ministry of Labor, the 3G obligation to provide evidence “also applies to employees who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons”.

The employer is responsible for checking the evidence. He may, however, also “delegate them to suitable employees or third parties” in compliance with data protection regulations.

Of the The controls should focus on the validity of the test evidence. Because anyone who has not been vaccinated or recovered has to show a negative test every day. Vaccinated or Genesis can be exempted from daily access controls once the employer has checked and documented their evidence.

See also  Berlin Airport Asks For Cash To Avoid Bankruptcy - Last Hour

What data is my employer allowed to collect under the 3G rule?

The employers’ right to information had recently caused considerable discussions, because the health data of employees is a particularly sensitive commodity. Now, however, the 3G rule is being put into effect in the midst of a massively worsening infection situation and is intended to help break chains of infection.

[Wenn Sie alle aktuellen Entwicklungen zur Coronavirus-Pandemie live auf Ihr Handy haben wollen, empfehlen wir Ihnen unsere App, die Sie hier für Apple- und Android-Geräte herunterladen können.]

According to the new Infection Protection Act, the principle of data minimization should apply as a middle way: According to the Ministry of Labor it is sufficient to “check off” the first and last names of the employees on a list on the respective inspection dayif the evidence has been provided.

For vaccinated and convalescent persons, the status only needs to be documented once; for those who have recovered, also with the end date of their status. The data must be deleted no later than six months after collection. In addition, employers must ensure that the data does not reach unauthorized persons or even colleagues.

The Federal Data Protection Officer Ulrich Kelber criticizes the fact that there is no pseudonymisation – i.e. a decoupling of the name – and that the data is not deleted immediately after the daily admission control, for example.

Read more service texts on the subject of Corona:

Is a self-made rapid test enough for unvaccinated people?

No. What is needed is one a maximum of 24 hours old rapid testwhich is made by a “service provider” in accordance with the coronavirus test regulation – this includes public test centers or medical practices.

Self-tests in the company under supervision or by third parties commissioned by the employer are also possible. This is to ensure that the tests run properly. PCR tests must be performed a maximum of 48 hours ago.

Which corona rules apply in the workplace?

Employees who are present at the workplace who have neither a vaccination nor a convalescent status should apply in the future test daily for Corona have to leave. This general 3G rule in the workplace is designed to help break the new wave of pandemics.

See also  DER SPIEGEL - App Update

The new 3G rule in the workplace is expected to be anchored in the Federal Infection Protection Act. It should be flanked by that Reintroduction of free corona “citizen tests”.

Are there any grants from the employer for the tests?

No. the Employers are only obliged to check the 3G certificate before entering the workplace and to document these checks. The regulations of the Infection Protection Act do not result in any further effort for the employer.

However, he must allow home office for office work or comparable activities, unless there are compelling operational reasons to the contrary.

What are the possible consequences of violations against the test rules?

What happens if employees refuse or fail to present a daily test – and then cannot go to the workplace? Can they then be exempted or do they have to fear other consequences? This is an essential question that has not yet been resolved. It is also unclear what happens if employers cannot produce the necessary documents during inspections.

Peter Meyer, a specialist lawyer specializing in labor law, thinks it is conceivable that those who refuse to take tests will face a Warning or even in the case of recurrence with a termination have to calculate. The refusal could be seen as a breach of duty.

3G rule in the workplace: What are employers asking for?

A 3G rule in the workplace do only with one right of providing information Sense, emphasized the general manager of the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations, Steffen Kampeter. And: If the employee does not meet his obligation to provide evidence, he will often no longer be able to be employed. “The principle then applies: Without performance, there is no wage. This is the only way to effectively guarantee in-house health protection. “

See also  Resuscitation with ventilator is allowed again from tomorrow • Norway releases last measures

The managing director of the German trade association, Stefan Genth, demanded that the costs for the tests should not be passed on to the companies. “Otherwise there is a risk of organizational and financial overload for many employers.” The tests would have to be paid for by the state.

The hotel and restaurant association Dehoga hopes that it will with one nationwide regulation could provide more legal certainty and clarity. “This increases the acceptance of the measures by the employees”, says General Manager Ingrid Hartges. The current legal situation is confusing.

What do unions say about 3G access rules in the workplace?

The DGB chairman Reiner Hoffmann said that due to the currently “escalating infection situation”, effective protection against infections at the workplace is more important than ever: “In addition to the existing occupational health and safety measures, 3G access rules at the workplace can be an effective means of doing this. The employer still has to bear the costs for the tests and that Testing must be part of the remunerated working hours.“

Employees in the workplace must be protected from infections as well as possible. At the same time, however, the basic rights of employees should not be disproportionately interfered with. Of the DGB therefore rejects an obligation of employees to provide information about their own corona vaccination status, says Hoffmann. “Nevertheless, we recommend that employees voluntarily disclose their vaccination status.”

What about a 2G rule in the workplace?

This is not yet planned. Attorney Meyer considers the implementation of a general 2G regulation in the workplace in Germany for particularly difficult. “Such a regulation would mean that an employee would no longer be allowed to work if he were to exercise his right not to be vaccinated.” In this respect, 2G would indirectly “cap” employment opportunities at the workplace, which in many cases would be disproportionate. (dpa, AFP)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.