Use a cotton swab if your ears are blocked or if you have wax? ENT doctors advise against it. Cotton swabs do even more harm. It is better to see a doctor.
Cotton swabs in the bathroom are a part of many households. But actually they should be taboo there, as the professional association of ear, nose and throat doctors advises. Cotton swabs do not help against clogged ears – on the contrary: “They just push the wax deeper into the ear,” warns Löhler. There is also the risk of injuring or even puncturing the eardrum. Sometimes the wax is pushed onto the eardrum.
ENT doctors warn: cotton swabs can be dangerous
“That makes cleaning more difficult and possibly more painful, because the doctor has to scrape the dirt off the eardrum.” And also of sprays or rinsing balls, with which you should be able to clean your ears yourself, you should better keep your hands off: They “have a limited use, especially because you cannot look yourself in your ear.”
What helps against clogged ears?
But what do you do if after washing your hair suddenly everything sounds dull and even shaking it doesn’t help?
Go to the doctor, sat Jan Löhler, himself an ENT doctor. Because usually there is ear wax behind it, which has swelled up by the water. The specialist removes it with a tick, or he rinses out the ears. According to the medical association, the health insurance companies bear the costs.
Why do many people suffer from stuffy ears?
If some people have blocked ears more often than others, it may depend on a number of factors. To a certain extent it is predisposition and depends on gender: Men are more likely to be affected than women, as Löhler says. But even those who regularly close their ear canal, for example who have to wear noise protection at work, have a hearing aid or sleep with earplugs, have an increased risk of clogged ears.
In principle, ear wax is useful, as Löhler emphasizes: “It has a nourishing and antibacterial effect. And it protects the ear canal from dirt and dust from penetrating deeper.” AZ / dpa
Sergey Halyapin Chief Engineer, Citrix Representative Office in Russia and the CIS
New norm: how remote work changes business processes
According to a OnePoll study, 69% of employees consider themselves more productive when working remotely, while 83% are confident that this format of work will allow them to better balance work and personal life.
Many questions tease Alain Dintu and his partner Sanah Crouche, whose infant died on Monday, February 26, at Victoria Hospital. What did their six-day-old baby die from? Could this be due to the substance that was given to her by injection and which, according to the mother, did not look the same as the one used the previous days? Or did he die because he did not burp, as the nursing staff allegedly told them? And how to explain that another seven-day-old baby is between life and death at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit after he has, according to Alain Dintu and Sanah Crouche, received the same injection.
It will be necessary to wait for the end of the investigation opened by the Ministry of Health to have elements of answers. The communications manager says this matter is taken very seriously. He said he was waiting for a report from the management of Victoria Hospital.
Parents, them, do not budge: they cry to medical negligence. They also lodged a complaint with the hospital police station. And they plan to take legal action against the hospital. They hammer home that the product that was used on Monday for the injection of their baby, who had been on antibiotics since birth, would not be the same as that administered the previous days. The substance used previously was, they said, a clear liquid, while the one given to their baby on Monday was milky white.
The fact that another baby is between life and death after having, according to them, received the same injection as their child would only confirm their doubts as to the nature of the substance used. Sanah Crouche, who we met on Monday, brushes aside claims the baby died because he didn’t burp. “Mo baba ti byen avan fer sa pikir-la. Aster-la linn mor e zot pe dir mwa akoz mo pann shot gas after kinn donn li bwar ”, explains the mother who had given birth by caesarean on February 21.
She specifies that in her capacity as babysitter, she specifies that she is not a novice in taking care of a baby. “If I didn’t burp my child after giving him a drink, what about the other mom whose baby had the same symptoms as mine?” Does that mean she couldn’t do it either? »She quips.
The mother of the other child who allegedly received the same injection is worried. She hopes her baby will be okay.
A unique climbing sculpture was set up in the atrium of the Clay Center for Art and Science in West Virginia: Ashton’s Climbing Sculpture was developed by the architect Spencer Luckey, who graduated from the Yale School of Architecture. The approximately 16 meter high climbing tower is made of wood and metal and can accommodate over 60 children at the same time.
Luckey’s goal was to create a structure that would encourage children to literally look at art and science from a new angle. The head of the Clay Center Al Najjar emphasized the imaginative and playful approach to the task of better networking the three exhibition floors of the children’s museum.
The entire composition is made up of three huge helixes, analogous to mathematically traced paths that are covered by the celestial bodies. Spencer Luckey described his work as an “artful dance of gravity and light”.
The capital again stood in lines and traffic jams. April 15, the first day of the system, which tightened the rules of movement for Muscovites, showed that the police and the traffic police did not have time to check the digital badges. Yesterday almost all the highways stood in the direction of the city center. Passengers complained about crowds, a stampede in the subway because of checks, social networks bombarded the authorities with angry comments, and now they risk becoming the first patients of an almost ready infection center in New Moscow.
Lhe Minister of Health, Gaétan Barrette, announced Tuesday morning in Shawville the granting of this sum to “bring the endoscope reprocessing space up to standards, next to which the procedure room, separated by a wall, will be moved”. According to the government, “the new layout of the premises will ensure that the transport of equipment will be continuous, without going back”. “The preparation area will be separate in order to respect patient confidentiality and allow individual meetings with health professionals,” said tone in the government press release. The reception and recovery areas will remain in common with the day surgery. ”
The work is expected to be completed by early 2019.
Minister Barrette mentioned that this announcement is aimed at the “safety” and “comfort” of patients.
Another announcement “concerning the health care offered in obstetrics” is scheduled with Mr. Barrette on Tuesday afternoon at the Gatineau Hospital.
The Department of Health has called for an investigation to shed light on the death of an eight-day-old baby at Victoria Hospital, Candos. According to Sanah Croush, the mother of the baby, the latter died on Monday morning February 26 after an injection of antibiotics.
The infant’s parents filed a complaint with the police for alleged medical negligence.
Listen to the mother’s testimony:
Another baby is in critical condition in the intensive care unit at Victoria Hospital for the same reason.
Listen to the testimony of his mother, Simee Lallbahadoor:
The Ministry of Health is awaiting a report from the hospital in both cases.
In 2015, Flamingo Conchy appeared at a military base in Key West, Florida. The staff alerted a nearby zoo. There the bird was fostered again. At some point Conchy should be released again. But where?
Scientists have long argued over flamingos in Florida. Many doubt that the birds are actually native to the state. Instead, they should be imported animals. For about seventy years, wild flamingos have been appearing in Florida with increasing frequency. Previously it was thought that the population goes back to flamingos that escaped from captivity in the 1920s and 1930s.
Now a team of researchers led by Steven Whitfield from the Miami Zoo has found that the birds probably belong to the natural fauna of the US state and were once found in flocks of up to 2,500 birds. However, hunters wiped out the Florida flamingos around 1900, the researchers write in the journal “The Condor: Ornithological Applications”. They have reappeared in the past few decades. For the study, the researchers analyzed reports from museums and data from bird counts.
At least 500 copies have been sighted since 1950. That may not seem like much, but the number has increased significantly in recent years, according to the researchers. In 2014, 150 flamingos appeared in the Everglades.
The researchers believe that some specimens could actually have come from zoos. However, there is evidence that many come from wild Mexico and Caribbean populations that have settled in Florida.
Introduced or Endangered?
For Flamingo Conchy and his fellow species, this knowledge makes a considerable difference. “We in Florida often say there are only two types of animals: the introduced and the endangered. But flamingos can’t be both at the same time,” says Whitfield. So far, flamingos are not considered native animals in Florida. They therefore do not enjoy any special protection.
“You’d think of a pink bird like the flamingo that we already knew the basics about it. In fact, we have a lot of questions,” says Whitfield.
Conchy was eventually abandoned and tracked in Everglades National Park. The scientists hoped the flamingo would fly home again and thus reveal its origin. But Conchy stayed in Florida. His tracker has meanwhile failed, but bird watchers keep reporting that they discovered Conchy with other flamingos.
Now the researchers want to analyze the DNA of the Florida flamingos and their eating habits in order to find out where the animals come from. Until then, they should be treated as part of the natural fauna, the scientists claim.
The 72-year-old writer Tennessee Williams died 35 years ago in New York. The world famous author ofA Tram called Désir is a tormented man (anguish, neurosis). He is also a frequent traveler – he is on the move and travels all the time. Considered one of the greatest American dramatic authors, he revolutionized the theater by staging frustrations and violence. And affirms that his theater aims at the purification of passions.
His work is translated into all languages but it is the 7th art that greatly contributes to his fame: the great directors of the time made numerous cinematographic adaptations of his plays (Richard Brooks, Elia Kazan, Joseph Mankiewicz, John Huston) . His characters are immortalized on screen by sacred monsters, such as Marlon Brando, Elizabeth Taylor, Paul Newman or Ava Gardner.
In 1968, Tennessee Williams explains himself, in a text republished The Literary Figaro, on his artistic creation considered cesspool: “It is not in the cesspools, but in the powerful current of life itself that I plunged to find my situations and my characters”.
Article published in Le Figaro Littéraire of March 18, 1968.
It’s not me who is complicated, it’s life
During my last stay in Hollywood, one of our most famous gossips, as remarkable for his extraordinary lack of elegance as for his prodigious knowledge of cinema circles, called me on the phone one fine morning and pounced on me with the ferocity of ‘a tigress defending her young. “I need to know,” she yelled on the other end of the line, why you wallow so, constantly, in the cesspool of vice …»
I happen to be well disposed towards this lady. An assiduous reader of magazines specializing in cinema, I owe him a few good times, those I spent reading his fiery philippics against stars whose private life overshadows his keen sense of ownership. So, far from sending him for a walk, I tried to appease him by explaining in detail why my artistic point of view was the opposite of his. (A word of explanation is in order here: PDV is a convenient abbreviation for “point of view”, used in film synopses). So, with the patience of an angel, I tried to persuade the lady that at my POS it is not in the cesspools, but in the powerful current of life itself that I plunged to find my situations and my characters. I couldn’t change his own POV, but managed to calm his fury.
My mother often said to me:
«My boy, don’t you find the world ugly enough that you want to represent it in the theater?She asked me this question with less anger than sadness, but somehow it was all the more difficult to answer her, especially as a child, even when he became a man in the prime of life, still feels a little guilty in front of his mother. I don’t think I ever tried to do it, but one day, to my surprise, I heard her formulate the answer herself. Someone had allowed himself to say to him: “Ah! Mrs Williams, why does your son waste his immense talent on such unhealthy subjects? ”
My mother replied so quickly that you would have thought she knew the answer by heart: “My son’s only theme, she said, is life“. And she says it with as much conviction as our southern ancestors once uttered their battle cry.
It is not the fundamental dignity of man, it is his fundamental ambiguity that must be emphasized, in my opinion.
The POV I’m leaving from is exactly the same: none zone of human experience, no behavior should be declared a prohibited zone for theater, film or television writers of our sad time, provided of course that their intentions are pure and that their taste is good. And I will add that aiming to restrict the author’s creative freedom would quickly lead to a sort of cultural fascism, identical to that which led to the Nazi fireworks or state control of all forms of art, as in Stalin’s Russia.
The rallying cry of those who want to see our creative heads fall under the guillotine is: “We need pieces which highlight what constitutes the fundamental dignity of man.That sounds good. The only problem with my POV is that no one knows exactly what this noble maxim can mean.
Between Delly and psychedelia …
The characters that interest us in the theater are those who, like us, hide deep within themselves a secret shame and fear.
All of us as long as we are, our hearts are full of humility, remorse and dread, no matter how desperate we try to change things. We are nothing less than convinced of our fundamental dignity or even of our fundamental honorability; also the characters that interest us in the theater are those who, like us, conceal deep within themselves a secret shame and fear, and we want to know the impression that these characters are telling us: “I understand you. You and I are brothers, life is a mess, but looking at it in the face, we can get away with it. “
It is not the fundamental dignity of man, it is his fundamental ambiguity that must be emphasized, in my opinion. Of course, I itch to talk about my own characters in this regard – Blanche du Bois, Serafina Delle Rose and even the sickly Princess Kosmopol – but let’s show a little dignity and talk about Brecht’s Mother Courage, the greatest of modern repertoire roles, in my opinion.
Mother Courage is just a jackal. She makes her butter on the backs of soldiers during the longest war in history, in her incredible wagon always assailed by a starving clientele, full of junk from which she always tries to get the best price. She even goes so far as to deny that her son is hers, and lets him do it without a cry, except the cry of pain that tears her heart. Why? Because she has to continue her journey with her cart, with her deaf and mute mother, and quite simply because she wants to live.
I took for example a work which, in my opinion, testifies, in modern language, to the only form of fundamental human dignity that I recognize.
If you were Prince Hamlet and contemplated Ophelia’s deadly anguish, would you or would you not neglect all personal considerations, at least once, to kiss her lovingly? Would you or would not stab the man behind a curtain through a curtain, just because you suspect, without being absolutely sure, that he may be your mother’s lover and your father’s murderer? At my POV, Prince Hamlet is cruel. And in your opinion?
Hamlet’s greatness is not in substance but in form. Never has lyricism reached such a high level in the theater, never has it had these accents of eternity. The laying bare of human truth in its less worthy and less honorable aspects is what makes Hamlet such a great drama. At least that is my PDV, illustrated by a character from classical theater and a character from modern theater.
Creation can take two forms: it can be organic or non-organic, it is always possible to modify or alter the nature of a non-organic work, by that I mean a work which does not also result from a necessity. vital for its creator as can be the beating of its heart or its breathing. On the contrary, you could well flay a writer whose work corresponds to an organic necessity without getting him to sincerely and durably renounce his faith, in what he does, however detestable on the other hand that this work may be or appear.
I believe we have done our best to spot the healthy cells and intact tissues of our contemporary world.
The creators, the artists, are like the nervous system of an era or a country. And if the nervous system is deeply affected by the ambient conditions, what it produces will inexorably reflect this disorder, sometimes in an indirect form, sometimes in all its violence, depending on the nature and discipline of the artist.
I don’t believe I am revealing a trade secret by pointing out how many artists, including writers, have sought refuge in neurosis, alcohol, drugs, religious ecstasy, and so on. To compile a complete list of such deviations would be unnecessary and tedious. Deprive contemporary art of its only source, forbid him to express individual passions and to sublimate them through works, it would be reduced to a land of such aridity that even a cactus could not flourish there.
Let us summarize the arguments of the defense: we are no more reprehensible than an x-ray machine or the needle used for a blood test. I believe we have done our best to spot healthy cells and intact tissues in our contemporary world, at the same time as we highlight suspicious spots and unhealthy germs.
No doubt, it would be an ideal world where Delly and psychedelia coexist. But if you have to choose, which one do you think you have to get rid of?
Par Tennessee Williams
(Translated from the American by Dominique Jamet.)
First step before the march against the arms of March 24 in Washington: Tallahassee. Tallahassee? This pretty town surrounded by subtropical forests is the capital of Florida where, on Wednesday February 21, the students of the high school of Parkland, an upscale city near Miami, the scene of a shooting that killed seventeen people a week earlier went. . The high school students took power. Without respecting the period of mourning with its obligatory prayers and tears, which give politicians time to turn around.
It all started with the diatribe of Emma Gonzalez, who challenged elected officials on Sunday, starting with the President of the United States, Donald Trump, dealing with hogwash (« bullshit ») their promises. Then her comrade Jaclyn Corin offered to organize a bus trip to Tallahassee. Immediate success: three coaches and a hundred young people made the trip Tuesday evening.
Read also The Trump administration’s fatalism in the face of mass shootings
Wednesday morning, after putting away their sleeping bags, the teenagers took the road to the Capitol, ten by ten, supervised by educators, with the slogan, ” Never again “. Mixture of excitement, emotion but also trauma. Tyra Hemans, 19, lost two friends in the shooting. Last year she was in the murderer’s class. In tears, she demands answers: “I need to understand why their guns are worth more than my life. “
Around noon, the students from Tallahassee joined the high school students. The city became the center of America for a day, followed by all the media. To the cries of “Protect the children, not the guns! “ and of “Resistance”, they were nearly 3,000 to demand acts of their elected officials. So that the Sunshine State, the “State of the Sun”, is no longer the « gunshine state », the state where guns shine thanks to one of the most lax laws in the United States.
If America is fond of theological debates on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees the right to bear arms, states have immense room for maneuver. It is thus almost impossible to have a weapon in New York. Florida has done nothing so far.
The dual power of the NRA
The young generation who took over the Capitol did not take the time to take a look at the “pantheon of women” honored by the State. She would have discovered the name of Marion Hammer. Aged 79, she was the first woman to be elected, in 1995, federal president of the National Rifle Association (NRA, the gun lobby), of which she continues to lead the Florida section.
You have 68.85% of this article to read. The rest is for subscribers only.